Who the f___ do you think you are?
In the past the term 'Republican' may have been standing for some quality, but today (so it seems) it has been really inflated to mean a paranoid selfish operating deviated narrow minded bunch of morons, which without any scrutiny (so it seems again) dare to think they stand above any law. To my opinion you cannot read (or even understand) laws apparently, and when some wise guy points you to juridical barricades you just step over them by presidential decree, and/or try to amend the law by parliamentary majority, which renders your law system one of the most corrupt around the globe.
No wonder there are plenty of 'enemy combatants' found to be on the face of this earth, which is spoiled, by the way, in overrepresented fashion by you as a community, while not even in statistics is token into account your emissions, pollution and other collateral damage administered by your war effort machine over the entire planet, for whatsoever reason.
As long as you condone the death penalty your political elite should not trust themselves in safety while they mistake themselves for righteous innocent christians.
GW Bush himself is a strong believer in the law. He approved of executions by blind trust in your law system, back in the good old times he was just (unjustly maybe) a Texan Governor that had the chance to look over the border with Mexico which comprised his only understanding of the term 'abroad' when he entered presidential office (for whatsoever reasons).
So, what am I talking about over here?
Firstly, my previous post mentioned a spy plane incident, which was of importance to you because on board computer systems might have contained strategical information that you certainly did not want to share with any other party.
Read the sequences of events here, and be astonished about the stupidity of your so called democratically elected government.
Secondly, the main issue in this blog entry addresses yet another New York Times article concerning notably clandestinely city police operations abroad meant to pacify the notably Republican National Convention to be held in 2004. Now, this was during the first term of the Bush jr administration.
"In at least some cases, intelligence on what appeared to be lawful activity was shared with police departments in other cities." Now that is a relief...
"Police records indicate that in addition to sharing information with other police departments, New York undercover officers were active themselves in at least 15 places outside New York — including California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montreal, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas and Washington, D.C. — and in Europe." This must be the international states police...
The Handschu Authority, installed in 1985 to prevent over-excessive NYPD monitoring of behaviour and activities beyond the scope of what regular policing should be concentrating on, thus there to approve of new initiatives planned, or taken, has been deprived of barring investigation on certain (expected to be) politically motivated activities since the 9/11 incident took place. But a senior police official still must determine that there is some indication of illegal activity before any inquiry whatsoever might be undertaken. 'Illegal' means against the law. "In the records reviewed by The Times, some of the police intelligence concerned people and groups bent on causing trouble, but the bulk of the reports covered the plans and views of people with no obvious intention of breaking the law." "“We also prepared to contend with a relatively small group of self-described anarchists who vowed to prevent delegates from participating in the convention or otherwise disrupt the convention by various means, including vandalism,”" might be held as just an example to the lawlessness of the supposedly threatening party to be scrutinized in full extent...
With law bending and law twisting agencies practically no assurance can be given about the restrictive capacity of the Handschu Authority (and thus on the Fourth Amendment of your Constitution). Examine this to the bottom, I should say while this is one of your domestic problems.
Moreover, the NY Times article states: "In another initiative, detectives were stationed in Europe and the Middle East to quickly funnel information back to New York.", now what is this all about? Don't you have sufficient CIA 'intelligence' or whatever?
You go screw your own country (even further) but don't you dare to screw ours as well.
No wonder there are plenty of 'enemy combatants' found to be on the face of this earth, which is spoiled, by the way, in overrepresented fashion by you as a community, while not even in statistics is token into account your emissions, pollution and other collateral damage administered by your war effort machine over the entire planet, for whatsoever reason.
As long as you condone the death penalty your political elite should not trust themselves in safety while they mistake themselves for righteous innocent christians.
GW Bush himself is a strong believer in the law. He approved of executions by blind trust in your law system, back in the good old times he was just (unjustly maybe) a Texan Governor that had the chance to look over the border with Mexico which comprised his only understanding of the term 'abroad' when he entered presidential office (for whatsoever reasons).
So, what am I talking about over here?
Firstly, my previous post mentioned a spy plane incident, which was of importance to you because on board computer systems might have contained strategical information that you certainly did not want to share with any other party.
Read the sequences of events here, and be astonished about the stupidity of your so called democratically elected government.
Secondly, the main issue in this blog entry addresses yet another New York Times article concerning notably clandestinely city police operations abroad meant to pacify the notably Republican National Convention to be held in 2004. Now, this was during the first term of the Bush jr administration.
"In at least some cases, intelligence on what appeared to be lawful activity was shared with police departments in other cities." Now that is a relief...
"Police records indicate that in addition to sharing information with other police departments, New York undercover officers were active themselves in at least 15 places outside New York — including California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montreal, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas and Washington, D.C. — and in Europe." This must be the international states police...
The Handschu Authority, installed in 1985 to prevent over-excessive NYPD monitoring of behaviour and activities beyond the scope of what regular policing should be concentrating on, thus there to approve of new initiatives planned, or taken, has been deprived of barring investigation on certain (expected to be) politically motivated activities since the 9/11 incident took place. But a senior police official still must determine that there is some indication of illegal activity before any inquiry whatsoever might be undertaken. 'Illegal' means against the law. "In the records reviewed by The Times, some of the police intelligence concerned people and groups bent on causing trouble, but the bulk of the reports covered the plans and views of people with no obvious intention of breaking the law." "“We also prepared to contend with a relatively small group of self-described anarchists who vowed to prevent delegates from participating in the convention or otherwise disrupt the convention by various means, including vandalism,”" might be held as just an example to the lawlessness of the supposedly threatening party to be scrutinized in full extent...
With law bending and law twisting agencies practically no assurance can be given about the restrictive capacity of the Handschu Authority (and thus on the Fourth Amendment of your Constitution). Examine this to the bottom, I should say while this is one of your domestic problems.
Moreover, the NY Times article states: "In another initiative, detectives were stationed in Europe and the Middle East to quickly funnel information back to New York.", now what is this all about? Don't you have sufficient CIA 'intelligence' or whatever?
You go screw your own country (even further) but don't you dare to screw ours as well.
posted by mxl at 1:58 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home